I have been thinking about this topic a lot, especially since all the hype about a “war on Christmas” last year and assorted responses that I read in blogs at the time.
I noticed that the idea of the secular celebration of Christmas has a different meaning depending on the audience.
On the one hand, I was reading bloggers (and hearing people in the real world) putting forth the idea that so many of our Christmas traditions are pagan in origin or modern secular innovations that it is unfair for fundamentalists to criticize us for “taking the Christ out of Christmas”.
In a similar vein, for people like me, who celebrate Christmas despite the fact that we are not Christian, it sometimes seems like certain people think we don’t deserve to participate, to which we respond that it is a secular celebration for us.
On the other hand, that line of argument is understandably annoying to someone who identifies with a minority religion (minority for this country) and is sick of having Christmas shoved in their faces all fall and winter long.
Wolfa had a post about this last year that is what started me thinking about the whole issue of “who are you saying ’secular’ to”. I might think of a Christmas tree as secular in the sense that I am not religious and I want to have a tree, but it is definitely associated with Christmas, a religious holiday. (My formerly-Catholic-now-Buddhist mother once tried the “it’s a pagan custom” line on a formerly-Jewish-now-Buddhist housemate. It didn’t go over well.)
A roommate I had during a study abroad stint in graduate school once told me that she thought that public Christmas displays, including nativity scenes, were good because they brought the community together (I guess the topic came up because we were in a village that celebrated a very traditional Easter Week.) I don’t think that at the time I was able to explain very well that the togetherness only works if you assume everyone is a Christian, or a Christmas-celebrating non-Christian. For everyone else, it is an act of exclusion. Stirrup Queens has a post up now comparing the Jewish experience of Christmas with the infertile experience of the dominantly fertile world.
[We INTERRUPT this post to discover that when the cable connection fails it is not necessarily the service provider's fault but perhaps a result of the Goddess Cat nesting on top of the Ethernet jack. Clearly this is my fault, because she can't sit in my her desk chair when I am blogging.]
So, while I personally don’t mind too much if my ob-gyn’s office is playing Christmas music (except that I thought the quality was not that good), and I figure it is more for the benefit of the front desk staff who are there all day, I wonder if they think at all about who they are excluding. Most people around here are Christian or Christmas-celebrators, but it is also a cosmopolitan university town with a lot of people who are not in those categories.
The message/audience issue came up in a post from a year ago that I just read by Renegade Rebbetzin (she linked to it in her most recent post). In reaction to Jewish bloggers who had been posting about how Chanukah was not so important and mostly got attention due to the proximity to Christmas, she wrote a very moving post about why Chanukah means so much to her. (I’m an atheist and that post made me cry. Of course, I’m pregnant. Also, I know a lot of Tibetans whose monasteries were destroyed, which is relevant to her Chanukah musings, really.)
In the comments, however, some people wrote that what bothered them was not the value or not of Chanukah in itself but the way the dominantly Christian American society has picked it up as the one Jewish holiday to pay attention to. That is, the problem was not that Jews over-hyped Chanukah because of competition from Christmas, but that non-Jews over-emphasize it because they can relate it to Christmas.
In Old Colony, most of the residents were not Christians. The citizens of the European Colonizing Country were mostly Catholic or culturally Catholic atheist types, but they were only about 3% of the population. Of the other 2% foreigners, some were from historically Christian countries and some were from other Asian countries. The old mixed-race/mixed-culture families were also Catholic, I think, and some of the other Chinese residents were Christians, but not most (despite 500 years of missionary work). Public decorations included lights on the main street and a large Christmas tree made of Coca-Cola (red) and Sprite (green) bottles (the kind of bottles that are glass with the thin styrofoam coating). I can’t remember if there were any nativity scenes. The public decor for Chinese New Year was much more prominent. There was plenty of resentment of European Colonizing Country in Old Colony, but religion was very far from being the dominant issue (money, corruption, political and bureaucratic power, language, self-determination, race were all far ahead of religion as far as I could tell, though I was just a short-term observer).
All of this is just a summary of things I started thinking about when I wanted to write a post on how I am celebrating the holidays this year. The all-about-me version is coming up in Secular Christmas, Part II.