Archive for February, 2007

At the Bookstore

February 28, 2007

Is it just me, or is the title Top 100 Baby Purees ambiguous? The subtitle did clarify that it was about purees for babies, and there is the whole context thing. It must just be my fuzzy brain.

If there are multiple copies of Babywise on the shelf is that because it sells well, so they carry a lot, or because it isn’t selling well, so they are stuck with the stock? Moxie says it is a bad, bad, book, Arwen says the theological basis is all wrong, and it is the only method mentioned by name–as something to avoid because it is dangerous for infants’ health–in the information packet from my hospital–so I hope it is the latter.

I was at the store to look for a copy of Husband Coached Childbirth: The Bradley Method of Natural Childbirth for my class. Maybe I’ll write about my reaction to that book after I finish reading it (or perhaps after I actually give birth*, though I’m thinking I’ll be otherwise occupied then).

*Standard disclaimer here about dead baby thoughts,  counting babies before they are hatched, knocking on wood, inshallah, gods willing and the creeks don’t rise, and so on.

Names, Part 2

February 26, 2007

As I mentioned in Part I, my husband and I agreed fairly easily on a first name for the kid.

Most of our negotiations/arguments have been about the last name. (Although I call him Mr. Luo on the blog, in real life we each kept our respective maiden names when we married.) I want a hyphenated name, either His-Mine or Mine-His. (Amongst my acquaintances, Hers-His seems more common. My mother thinks His-Mine sounds better; I suspect a certain bias against my father’s surname.) My husband would rather have either Mine or His, but hates the idea of the hyphen.

Rational supporting points don’t get us very far:**

Example 1

He: It’s too complicated. What happens if the kid wants to marry somebody else with a hyphenated name and they have a kid?

Me: Bullshit. Entire civilizations have already dealt with this issue. (OK, Spanish and Portuguese names don’t have hyphens, but they use both surnames and their kids don’t end up in therapy because of it.)

Example 2

Me: Both of our names together are the same number of letters, and fewer syllables, than my mother’s last name. It’s not that complicated.

He: That doesn’t matter. The problem isn’t the length, it’s the hyphen.

Therefore, we are reduced to less evidence-based persuasion:**

Example 3

He: In this state, giving the kid a hyphenated last name is like having a boy named Sue. He’ll end up a football player for sure.

Me: Hmm, that would be a problem.* Hey, wait a second, none of the football players I read about around here have hyphenated names…

Example 4

Me: When I was a kid and my parents divorced, I was asked if I wanted to take my mother’s name, but I didn’t because it seemed like rejecting my father because his was the name I already had and as an adult it seemed too late to change because his name had been my name for so longand if I’d had a hyphenated name I wouldn’t have had to choose and every kid, especially ours, should have both of her or his parents’ names!

He: Um, please don’t cry.

* I don’t hate football players. My father played in college for a year, on a team you might have even heard of, and my brother played in high school for a couple of years. I like both of them. I haven’t had any problems with the football players in my classes, either. In this state, though, football is a religion, and as an atheist, I’d rather not be involved.

** Over the years, I have read numerous threads about surnames and hyphenation on various listserves and blogs. I have found none of the arguments against hyphenated names for the kids convincing in the least. I fully expect to win this argument. So there.

Friday Cat Blogging: Inept Caretakers

February 23, 2007

It’s a good thing our cats don’t read blogs, because the Goddess would be thinking:

How did I get stuck with these bozos? I came from Berkeley; why couldn’t I have ended up with someone like Chris Clarke? Oh, he would be all responsible and insist on giving me the iv fluids when my kidneys started failing, but at least he wouldn’t fuck it up and stick me with the needle but somehow fail to even get any of the fluids in.

Just when we thought we had the hang of it, and were consistently injecting the 240 ccs that the vet recommended, we lost our touch. Recently it’s taken us three tries to get 100ccs in. I blame a combination of my husband trying to hold her in a different position and equipment problems. Plus my incompetence.

On the other hand, the having the needle inserted and in place seems to bother her a lot less than the feeling of the fluids being injected, so maybe she prefers it this way.

A Tiny Bit More about First Names

February 22, 2007

When I wrote Names, Part I, I kept thinking of a post I had read at A Little Pregnant when Julie was pregnant with Charlie, then known as Batman. She found some interesting names in her family’s genealogical charts.

A few years ago, one of my father’s cousins sent him some genealogical information from the non-Irish side of my family. (My brother and I were horrified to discover we were in part descended from the English oppressors.) It took a while to find the list (and what is the point of having so many neatly labeled files if I can’t find things anyway?), and when I did it was a little disappointing. Lots of Nathaniels and Sarahs and Johns and Marys.

The only really interesting names were Elkannah (b. 1712, gender not specified) and Abija (b. 1753, male).

I couldn’t find Julie’s post yesterday, but today I just started going through all the posts from her pregnancy with Charlie (hi, just me, not a stalker), you know, because my childbirth education class was cancelled and it’s not like I have any work I’m supposed to be doing.

Turns out, Julie’s got an Elkanah in her family tree too. Maybe we’re related, though the genealogy I have only goes back to a couple of brothers’ arrival in the colonies, not to Adam and Eve, like hers does.

Names, Part 1

February 20, 2007

My father once told me that unusual names were fine for girls, but normal names were better for boys. I thought that was ridiculous, even though I like my name. Of his seven kids, I probably have the most unusual of the four girl’s names (I was named after a friend of my mother). The three boys all have common names. I thought my youngest half-brother’s name was unusual when he was born, but it turned out to be common in his age group (in fact, a friend of mine also had a much-younger half brother born around then who got the same name).

According to the Social Security Administration’s Baby Name site, my name made it too the top 1000 for girls briefly in the 1990s, but is otherwise off the charts. It hit the top 100 for boys in the late 1980s, but is barely hanging in there at this point. If you put my real first and last names into the “How Many of Me” site, it will tell you that nobody in the United States has my name. (It seemed to say that about a lot of bloggers when people were checking it out. Maybe they were all named after friends of my mother.) One of the things I don’t like about the state in which I currently live is that both my first name and my last name are more common here than anyplace else I have ever lived. It is unnerving to me.

My brother’s name (the one I’m closest to, the one with the same mother) has been in the top 20, mostly the top 5, since 1880, which is as far back as the Social Security site goes. I could use his real name on my blog, and it would look like a pseudonym.

One of my husband’s reasons for wanting to know the sex of the fetus was to simplify choosing a name, or at least to reduce the negotiations by half.

Finding out that it’s a boy probably did simplify things, because on my own lists of possible names, I was much more attached to the women’s names than the men’s ones. My feminine choices were things like my grandmother’s name, a dear family friend’s name, a good friend’s unusual and very cool name, and the name of an Irish graduate student I knew. All good names, none of them currently very common in the United States. Hey, in graduate school, I was ready to name my first-born after my psychiatrist and/or therapist, so this kid is lucky I waited to breed.

It turns out that one of my top boy’s names is a favorite for my husband as well, so we’ll probably go with that. Maybe. Currently, we’re mostly trying to decide on a middle name.

My main reservation about our current preferred first name for the kid is that it might be too normal, because that would seem like agreeing with my father about something he mentioned casually decades ago, and we can’t have that.

As will be clear from the post, for baby names, I tend to think of relatives or friends I like, or relatives or friends whose names I like. Apparently, if you name a boy after somebody I know, you get a much more common name than if you name a girl after somebody I know.

Like my brother’s name, the name we are thinking of has historically been popular, and is still in the top 100. I’m only reassured because it is moving down the rankings rather than up.

I put it on my list because it is the name of a couple of my husband’s friends and its most common nickname is in fact the name by which his group of graduate school friends were know. (Imagine if there were some infertility bloggers named Julie, Julia, Grrl, Karen, Danae, Jo, and Tertia, and everyone called them “the Julies.” It’s sort of like that. Who said computer science graduate students were logical?)

I didn’t put many family names on my list of boy’s names, because too many men in my family have the same name and enough is enough. It doesn’t help that my husband’s name is a variation of that common name from my side. I like my husband’s middle name, which is a variation of his grandfather’s name, but I don’t fancy it for our kid. Much as I like him personally, I don’t want to saddle a kid with my father-in-law’s name. (According to the Baby Name Voyager’s graphs, my father-in-law may have been the last boy in the United States ever given his name.) I have a vague understanding of a Jewish custom of taking the first initial of a relative’s name for a kid’s name, but haven’t come up with a good name that would fit, and it’s not like my husband’s family follows many non-culinary ashkenazi traditions. I vetoed his other grandfather’s name because I didn’t like it. He vetoed a nice Irish name from my list because some old adversary of his had that name.

I have been trying to think of good X names for a middle name, to offset the perhaps-too-common first name. Xavier would be good, except that it would sound like either we were Catholics or X-men fanatics. Xerxes? (Didn’t he kill a lot of people?) Xander? (I’d have to watch some Buffy to see if I even like that character.) X’s got me into Z’s: Zebediah, Zebulon? (Too reminiscent of Robert Heinlein’s Number of the Beast-ish). Zaphod? (No, but I may use that one for the kid’s bog name.)

Anyway, the current naming status is that we do have a first choice that has only been shared with our parents so far, but who knows? We may end up with a little Zebediah Xerxes after all.

Gastrulation Link

February 19, 2007

Need something to distract yourself from the two-week wait? Try reading an explanation of the process of gastrulation at Pharyngula.

In the simplest terms, gastrulation is a stage in early development; in human beings it occurs between two and three weeks after fertilization. It is that stage when a two-layered cell mass undergoes a set of specific movements and interactions that establish the three germ layers of the embryo (endoderm, mesoderm, and ectoderm) and the beginnings of a three-dimensional structure. The end result doesn’t look like much of an animal, but it has set up pools of cells that will contribute to specific future cell types, and has laid down the rough outline of tissues along the body axis.

Thanks, PZ Myers.

I’m off to re-read it. It’s been a long time since I could get away with skimming a biology text. Fortunately, PZ included pictures.

UPDATE: More on gastrulation from PZ, in case you want to know how invertebrates do it.

Cars and Seats

February 18, 2007

We are almost ready to buy a carseat. This would be our first baby-related purchase, which makes sense, since we can’t take the baby home from the hospital without it. I was browsing the fancy baby store near my yoga class and noticed the carseats were on sale, which prompted me to go online to check prices and do some research about whether I really wanted the superfancy carseat, so I would know whether I should rush to take advantage of the sale.

When I looked at the Amazon.com page for this car seat, I thought, “why would it recommend under ‘Better together’ that I buy this car seat along with another carseat (same brand and model, different color)?”

Oh, right. Most couples have two cars. (And some have twins, but despite my what my blog reading might indicate, twins are still not the norm, so I didn’t think of that till later.)

Hmm. How much of a Big Brother is Amazon? If I were coming from a New York City ISP, would it still think I needed two carseats?

Anyway, the fact that we only have to pay to outfit one car with a carseat is one of my justifications for spending the money on the fancy one. The other is safety. Hey, Estelle (a certified Child Passenger Safety Technician) at Faggots on the Third Floor recommends it. Of course, she also says most seats that meet the standards are safe (and don’t get her started on Consumer Reports).

Bottom line- If you buy a seat approved for sale on the US market, and you use that seat properly and according to manufacturer’s guidelines, your child is very safe. If you buy the best seat you can (and I won’t lie, I don’t think there are any seats as safe as Britax), have a professional teach you to install it, use it correctly EVERY time, keep it rear facing as long as possible, and keep your child harnessed as long as possible, your child will very, VERY safe.

Anyway, I have been contemplating the fact that we can afford the fancy carseat. The reviews that gush “isn’t your baby worth it” annoy me, because they don’t seem to acknowledge the privilege involved. As Bruce Schneier keeps reminding us, security involves tradeoffs. Estelle writes about the tradeoff between ease of use and safety in a car seat in her post, but there is also an economic tradeoff. If the tradeoff is between $250 (or, to be fair, the price differential between the very safe seat and the very, VERY safe seat) worth of shoes and a great carseat, then sure, your baby’s safety is worth it, but if the tradeoff is between rent and the fancy seat, you need to pay the rent.

To move on to more superficial matters, we will probably buy the boring brown version. “Onyx” looks much nicer to me. Plus, it would clearly be the choice of Mark Vorkosigan, if he had a little baby, right? Not that I want to emulate Mark in personal matters, but the onyx made me think of the butter bug designs in A Civil Campaign.* Unfortunately, it would probably just get too hot during the summer around here (and by summer I mean anytime it gets over 85 degrees, which is about .) I tried to argue that we shouldn’t deny the kid a flowery pattern just because of his gender, but the flowery pattern was sort of ugly in my opinion, so my argument was halfhearted. So, brown carseat on top of boring beige car upholstery it is, I guess.

This kind of practicality about the colors is, I think, one of the disadvantages of being an older parent. Although, given that I don’t like cars and I don’t like heat and my childhood car memories involve getting carsick every time we drove through the desert, I probably would have been sensitive to the heat issue even in my young, hip (hahaha, I was never hip, though perhaps I was less boring then) days.

(On the subject of gender-appropriate colors, can I just say that it is a good thing that blue is my favorite color, and that I am not that fond of pink, though I like it a lot more now than I did when I was a little girl. Because based on my browsing so far and my reading of blog-rants by parents of small children, it is hard to buy anything that is not blue or pink, so I imagine we will be getting plenty of blue gifts.)

*by Lois McMaster Bujold. Try to ignore the cover. If you’re a fan of the Miles Vorkosigan books, you’ve already read it. If not, don’t start with this one. Read Shards of Honor and Barrayar (republished together as Cordelia’s Honor). Special bonus: lots of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

About Television that I Don’t Watch

February 16, 2007

Someday, I am going to have to watch 24.* Or maybe I just need to read Heather Havrilesky at Salon more regularly.

So Jack injects his brother with something that makes him feel a lot of pain (from my personal experience, I’m guessing it’s Pitocin), and his brother is moaning and screaming, and instead of keeping his brother focused on his breathing, Jack is bellowing into his ear, “Tell me where McCarthy is! Tell me what you know!” and Ugly Brother is weeping and sweating and I’m thinking he’s got to be at least 4 centimeters dilated by this point, and just when Jack is about to tell him that it’s time to push, Ugly Brother tells him that he was the evil voice on the phone last season, pulling all the strings and screwing with Jack and shooting the Best President Ever in the neck.

Maybe this just caught my eye because we attended our first Bradley childbirth class on Valentine’s Day.

* I saw part of an episode in the first season. From what I hear, since then the show has involved a lot of torture. I’m disturbed by popular culture representations of torture as something that just has to be done, though I can’t comment on 24 in particular, not having seen it.

Maternity Leave

February 15, 2007

Emmie at Better Make it a Double and Laura at 11D have both posted recently about the FMLA (Family Medical Leave Act). If you have any comments on the Act, you have until tomorrow, 2/16, to pass them along. Yes, some employers with political clout have found that an act which only guarantees the right to keep your job after taking unpaid leave is too onerous.

I understand that it can be difficult to deal with employees taking leave, especially non-continuous leave. As a professor, my job is very flexible in many ways, but I teach a semester at a time. I have taught somebody else’s classes for a couple of weeks when she was dealing with a parents’ death and funeral. In graduate school, I took an emergency medical leave of absence in the middle of a semester (for the rest of the term) and another graduate student took over the course I was teaching for rest of the semester. A quick substitution, primarily following the course instructor’s plans, is a short-term and minor burden. Taking over a course for a designated period of time, and getting paid for it, is extra work for extra pay (and while it was disruptive for the students, it really was better than having a suicidally depressed teacher; I think they were much happier with the substitute). As Dean Dad pointed out a while ago though, anything that is uncertain or doesn’t fit into a semester is difficult to plan for.

All true, but that is the price of having human employees. For example, aside from dealing with one’s own illness after sick leave has run out, a parent whose adolescent child is experiencing mental illness and/or chemical addiction will have to deal with a lot of scheduled appointments and a lot of unscheduled emergencies. A spouse might have similar scheduled and unscheduled needs when seriously ill.

In theory, maternity leave is one of the easier leaves to deal with: we have an approximate due date and can schedule 12 weeks off after that. As Emmie reminds us, however, it’s not always that simple. When a friend of mine was on bedrest for preterm labor, she got short-term disabilty pay. Not everyone has that option; Emmie used up her 12 weeks of unpaid leave before her twins were even born.

All this is on my mind as I try to figure out what to do next semester. I always thought I would need a semester off if I gave birth to or adopted a child, especially since I started thinking about this long before I met my husband, so I was contemplating single motherhood. I was warned that my institution had no paid maternity leave a few years ago when a friend of mine got pregnant and told me how bad our university’s policies were. I thought, well, unlike my friend, by the time I have a kid, I’ll have been here long enough to be eligible to use my short-term disabilty and to accumulate a lot of sick leave. When I checked with human resources, however, I found out that I can’t use sick leave or short-term disability unless I am, in fact, ill. That is, I can take 6 or 8 weeks of sick leave after vaginal or ceasarian birth, respectively, because that is what the doctor specifies on the forms he fills out. Since my due date is in the summer, when I am technically not employed (September to May contract), I won’t even use that sick leave. After that, officially it’s unpaid FMLA or nothing.

I have some savings left over from an inheritance that I had mentally designated as either self-paid maternity leave or house down payment. Back when I got my job, the amount was about equal to one semester’s salary. Now it isn’t (thanks to unexpectedly generous raises that still haven’t put our salaries anywhere near the MLA’s recommendations).

Then, because I am on sabbatical this year, I thought I shouldn’t even try to take next semester off. Too long away. Abandoning my department. Bad for my career. I had resigned myself to starting teaching when the kid was 2 1/2 months old (yes, the contracts start in September, but classes start in August, just a little quirk in the system). My friend had gotten some reassigned time when she had her baby, and she told me a) I should definitely talk to my chair about getting out of teaching next semester b) in part because the fall will be right when the stranger anxiety part of attachment is kicking in for the baby and c) not to worry about being off campus another semester, especially since I already have tenure.

So I talked to my chair, and I talked to the dean. We are working out some combination of things that will probably result in my working, but not teaching, for 50% or 75% time next semester.

I have left some of these meetings wondering whether I can really accomplish the jobs that will constitute the reassignment of my time. It will be better not to have to commute, and not to have to teach the night class I am scheduled for in the fall, but I’m not under the illusion that at-home productivity is easy with a baby to take care of (thanks, blogs). Then I think “what am I, a princess, that I want to be paid to stay home and take care of a baby?” When I read about how almost every other country (not just rich industrialized countries) has paid maternity leave, I realize how much my thinking is conditioned by the norms in the United States. I don’t want to be a princess, just a Swedish or English mother.

I am aware that I am writing from a privileged perspective here: I have a schedule that allows me to work from home 2-3 days a week even when I am teaching; I have paid sick leave; I have savings; I have a spouse with (disability insurance) income who is currently at home. Also, colleagues who had their kids 15 years ago had a much worse situation.

Basically, I am torn between resenting the choices I have (due to lack of paid maternity leave) and feeling lucky for choices I have (due to income, savings, Mr. Luo being at home and so on). I know I am not alone.

24w5d

February 12, 2007

I had a short check-up on Friday. According to the doctor, everything is fine, and my belly measures just where it is supposed to be. Ever since then, I have been thinking I look more pregnant, as opposed to just having a fat belly, but if there is one thing I have learned over the past decade, it is that I really have no accurate sense of what my body looks like, even when I am staring at it naked in a mirror. (If that doesn’t make sense, congratulations on not having any body-image problems.) Mr.Luo thinks I have looked pregnant for a long time. (Conversation a while back: “Do my breasts look bigger to you?” “Yes. They look maternal.”)

Despite the fact that I can now feel movement all the time, I still got worried when the nurse didn’t hear the heartbeat right away (she started looking on the wrong side).

I have had some dizzy spells recently, which the doctor blames on the fetus moving around and cutting off flow of (oxygen?blood? both I guess) to brain. Except that he said “orthostatic hypotension” which I though was when the dizziness comes after getting up suddenly, which is not my problem. Also, blood in my stools is most likely from internal hemorroids. I know that is too much information, but having gotten so much of my information about pregnancy from blogs, I feel like I should share the gory details.

In other news, I signed us up for a childbirth education class (Bradley style) that starts on Valentines Day. Well, I sent a deposit, but the class was nearly full, so I have to check that we are, in fact, in the class.

We also booked tickets for our trip to see friends and family on the West Coast, though we haven’t quite finished with getting lodging and a rental car for one of the two places we’re visiting.

The childbirth class lasts 12 weeks. We’ll miss one class when we’re on our trip and one later on when we go to my academic conference in April. (The doctor said it was fine to go as long as I was still healthy then, at 34-35 weeks. At least one of my friends thinks I am crazy.)

In four weeks, I’ll have another sonogram to check that the kid’s growth is ok, and the one-hour glucose tolerance test to check for gestational diabetes. That’s something I’m at risk for, but I am trying not to worry about the test too much.

I have gotten over my hesitation at telling friends I am pregnant (I was writing a post about “showing and telling” in my head but was too lethargic to post). So now, people keep asking how I am, which is fine, and asking about morning sickness, which is funny to me because the first trimester was so long ago (yes, I have friends who were sick the whole time, but I think when most people ask, they are thinking about the typical first trimester nausea).